Jul
4
Why do Fox News and CNN have such a difference in the amount of delegates each candidate has recieved?
Filed Under Elections
John V asked:
I have been watching the 2008 presidential election religiously. I noticed that Obama is a lot closer according to Fox News than he is on CNN. As of this moment, Obama is 42 behind on Fox News, and 72 behind on CNN. How can 2 different news sources have 2 completely different totals?
CLAY
I have been watching the 2008 presidential election religiously. I noticed that Obama is a lot closer according to Fox News than he is on CNN. As of this moment, Obama is 42 behind on Fox News, and 72 behind on CNN. How can 2 different news sources have 2 completely different totals?
CLAY
Comments
8 Responses to “Why do Fox News and CNN have such a difference in the amount of delegates each candidate has recieved?”

One is run by the Bush Family and one isn’t.
Trust nothing Fox says. CNN ain’t much better, tho. Either way the electronic voting machines tend to have a *mind of their own* so who really knows what’s going on…
Yeah, and Ron Paul was down this morning as having 10, 14 and 42, depending on who you read.
I think it is a conspiracy.
Or they are morons.
Take your pick.
Some are superdelegates. Other times, I suspect that they’re counting the Florida and/or Michigan delegates.
I’m sure it has something to do with the superdelegates. Hillary has more of them than Obama. Guess that’s what she needed the 5 mil for.
I don’t understand it either. I just have to hope it will all work out in the end and the one with the most votes will be declared the winner.
Some results include the superdelegates and some do not. A superdelegate is basically someone with power within the party–Democratic representatives, senators, governors, etc. Superdelegates also include former Presidents (Bill, anyone?), Speakers of the House, Senate Majority and Minority Leaders, and so on. Clinton has more of these superdelegates pledged to her, but some news stations are not counting them until the convention.
Because the liberal media wants hillary and
the rest think obama should run for president. Either way, I think everyone should write in Mike Huckabee.